↓ Skip to main content

Limitations of rupture forecasting exposed by instantaneously triggered earthquake doublet

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
31 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Limitations of rupture forecasting exposed by instantaneously triggered earthquake doublet
Published in
Nature Geoscience, February 2016
DOI 10.1038/ngeo2653
Authors

E. Nissen, J. R. Elliott, R. A. Sloan, T. J. Craig, G. J. Funning, A. Hutko, B. E. Parsons, T. J. Wright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 89 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 29%
Researcher 24 25%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 76 80%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Chemistry 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#221,737
of 14,220,569 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#610
of 2,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,363
of 339,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#26
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,220,569 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.