| Title |
Limitations of rupture forecasting exposed by instantaneously triggered earthquake doublet
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ngeo2653 |
| Authors |
E. Nissen, J. R. Elliott, R. A. Sloan, T. J. Craig, G. J. Funning, A. Hutko, B. E. Parsons, T. J. Wright |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 23% |
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| Portugal | 2 | 6% |
| Pakistan | 2 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 69% |
| Scientists | 7 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 28% |
| Researcher | 24 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 89 | 72% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#477,541
of 24,351,425 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#920
of 3,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,281
of 407,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#25
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,351,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.