↓ Skip to main content

Limitations of rupture forecasting exposed by instantaneously triggered earthquake doublet

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Limitations of rupture forecasting exposed by instantaneously triggered earthquake doublet
Published in
Nature Geoscience, February 2016
DOI 10.1038/ngeo2653
Authors

E. Nissen, J. R. Elliott, R. A. Sloan, T. J. Craig, G. J. Funning, A. Hutko, B. E. Parsons, T. J. Wright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 113 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 30%
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 88 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Chemistry 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 22 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2022.
All research outputs
#413,791
of 22,368,365 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#843
of 3,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,463
of 380,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#26
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,368,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 97.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.