↓ Skip to main content

Perception and attitudes towards preventives of malaria infection during pregnancy in Enugu State, Nigeria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Perception and attitudes towards preventives of malaria infection during pregnancy in Enugu State, Nigeria
Published in
Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s41043-015-0033-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nkechi G. Onyeneho, Ngozi Idemili-Aronu, Ijeoma Igwe, Felicia U. Iremeka

Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore and document perceptions and attitude associated with uptake of interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy infection during pregnancy in Enugu State, Nigeria. This is a cross-sectional study in three local government areas in Enugu State to identify the people's perceptions and attitudes towards sleeping under insecticide-treated bednets and uptake of recommended doses of intermittent presumptive treatment during pregnancy. In-depth interview guides were employed to collect data from health workers and mothers who delivered within 6 months preceding the study, while focus group discussion guides were employed in collecting data from grandmothers and fathers of children born within 6 months preceding the study. The people expressed fairly good knowledge of malaria, having lived in the malaria-endemic communities. However, some were ignorant on what should be done to prevent malaria in pregnancy. Those who were aware of the use of insecticide-treated bednets and intermittent presumptive treatment during pregnancy however lamented the attitude of the health workers, who make access to these interventions difficult. Efforts to prevent malaria in pregnancy should focus on providing health education to pregnant women and their partners, who reinforce what the women are told during antenatal care. The attitude of health workers towards patients, who need these interventions, should be targeted for change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 159 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 28%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 31%
Social Sciences 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Design 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2023.
All research outputs
#14,913,921
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#327
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,572
of 392,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.