| Title |
Supersaturation-controlled microcrystallization and visualization analysis for serial femtosecond crystallography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-20899-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dan Bi Lee, Jong-Min Kim, Jong Hyeon Seok, Ji-Hye Lee, Jae Deok Jo, Ji Young Mun, Chelsie Conrad, Jesse Coe, Garrett Nelson, Brenda Hogue, Thomas A. White, Nadia Zatsepin, Uwe Weierstall, Anton Barty, Henry Chapman, Petra Fromme, John Spence, Mi Sook Chung, Chang-Hyun Oh, Kyung Hyun Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 35% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#12,816,615
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#54,441
of 124,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,891
of 438,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,741
of 3,852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.