RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @trevoragraham: A theme common to both letters is that evolutionary models including selection can fit the availiable data equally well…
RT @trevoragraham: A theme common to both letters is that evolutionary models including selection can fit the availiable data equally well…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @trevoragraham: A theme common to both letters is that evolutionary models including selection can fit the availiable data equally well…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @trevoragraham: A theme common to both letters is that evolutionary models including selection can fit the availiable data equally well…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @LuisglsZ: Our work debating #neutralevolution is out!!!! https://t.co/Rj2fgeGGx0
RT @trevoragraham: A theme common to both letters is that evolutionary models including selection can fit the availiable data equally well…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
Always fun when the old neutralist/selectionist debate hits a new field. *** grabs popcorn ***
RT @trevoragraham: A theme common to both letters is that evolutionary models including selection can fit the availiable data equally well…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @trevoragraham: A theme common to both letters is that evolutionary models including selection can fit the availiable data equally well…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
A theme common to both letters is that evolutionary models including selection can fit the availiable data equally well as the neutral null model. In reply we argue Occam's Razor: that in such cases we should then accept the simplest model (neutral) over m
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
Some hot discussion going on here. Join the debate on measuring selection from bulk sequencing data.
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @BenjaminWerner_: How to interpret cancer genomics data? A long and fruitful debate on selection/neutrality in cancer continues. https:/…
RT @BenjaminWerner_: How to interpret cancer genomics data? A long and fruitful debate on selection/neutrality in cancer continues. https:/…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @BenjaminWerner_: How to interpret cancer genomics data? A long and fruitful debate on selection/neutrality in cancer continues. https:/…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @BenjaminWerner_: How to interpret cancer genomics data? A long and fruitful debate on selection/neutrality in cancer continues. https:/…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @BenjaminWerner_: How to interpret cancer genomics data? A long and fruitful debate on selection/neutrality in cancer continues. https:/…
RT @LuisglsZ: Our work debating #neutralevolution is out!!!! https://t.co/Rj2fgeGGx0
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @SBAmin: Do a subset of cancers or patient cohort of a cancer evolve predominantly by neutral or clonal evolution? Difficult and often d…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
How to interpret cancer genomics data? A long and fruitful debate on selection/neutrality in cancer continues.
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @SBAmin: Do a subset of cancers or patient cohort of a cancer evolve predominantly by neutral or clonal evolution? Difficult and often d…
Do a subset of cancers or patient cohort of a cancer evolve predominantly by neutral or clonal evolution? Difficult and often debatable question but perhaps, this is the most healthy and professional discussion I've seen in years. Haven't read all but wort
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
Our work debating #neutralevolution is out!!!!
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
RT @AndreaSottoriva: Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG…
Even more on the #neutralevolution in cancer debate: letters by McDonald, Chakrabarti & Michor, and Tarabichi & #PCAWG, both followed by our replies: https://t.co/h5T6Nlfdrk https://t.co/trS19oUmLz https://t.co/VLljIYZxOs https://t.co/i7KIF6Iav9 Di
Reply to ‘Neutral tumor evolution?’ https://t.co/obL4i0ORTC