↓ Skip to main content

Reply to ‘Neutral tumor evolution?’

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
53 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Reply to ‘Neutral tumor evolution?’
Published in
Nature Genetics, October 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41588-018-0256-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timon Heide, Luis Zapata, Marc J. Williams, Benjamin Werner, Giulio Caravagna, Chris P. Barnes, Trevor A. Graham, Andrea Sottoriva

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Researcher 13 23%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 27%
Computer Science 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#836,973
of 17,371,891 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,532
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,832
of 329,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#41
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,371,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.