↓ Skip to main content

What da Vinci saw in trees

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
What da Vinci saw in trees
Published in
Nature, December 2011
DOI 10.1038/480417a
Pubmed ID
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#5,809,207
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#60,975
of 92,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,976
of 245,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#700
of 927 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 927 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.