↓ Skip to main content

Locus Coeruleus as a vigilance centre for active inspiration and expiration in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Locus Coeruleus as a vigilance centre for active inspiration and expiration in rats
Published in
Scientific Reports, October 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-34047-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karolyne S. Magalhães, Pedro F. Spiller, Melina P. da Silva, Luciana B. Kuntze, Julian F. R. Paton, Benedito H. Machado, Davi J. A. Moraes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,599,335
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#51,738
of 126,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,246
of 351,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,393
of 3,271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.