| Title |
Transcriptional control of endothelial energy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature16866 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christer Betsholtz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| India | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 63% |
| Scientists | 21 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 28% |
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#834,272
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#29,399
of 98,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,348
of 402,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#573
of 943 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 943 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.