| Title |
The dispersion–brightness relation for fast radio bursts from a wide-field survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0588-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. M. Shannon, J.-P. Macquart, K. W. Bannister, R. D. Ekers, C. W. James, S. Osłowski, H. Qiu, M. Sammons, A. W. Hotan, M. A. Voronkov, R. J. Beresford, M. Brothers, A. J. Brown, J. D. Bunton, A. P. Chippendale, C. Haskins, M. Leach, M. Marquarding, D. McConnell, M. A. Pilawa, E. M. Sadler, E. R. Troup, J. Tuthill, M. T. Whiting, J. R. Allison, C. S. Anderson, M. E. Bell, J. D. Collier, G. Gürkan, G. Heald, C. J. Riseley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 14% |
| Australia | 10 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 2 | 3% |
| Latvia | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 63% |
| Scientists | 19 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 24% |
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 38 | 61% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 466. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#58,803
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,678
of 98,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,165
of 357,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#117
of 1,126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.