↓ Skip to main content

Publisher Correction: Polymorphic residues in rice NLRs expand binding and response to effectors of the blast pathogen

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Plants, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Publisher Correction: Polymorphic residues in rice NLRs expand binding and response to effectors of the blast pathogen
Published in
Nature Plants, August 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41477-018-0248-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Carlos De la Concepcion, Marina Franceschetti, Abbas Maqbool, Hiromasa Saitoh, Ryohei Terauchi, Sophien Kamoun, Mark J. Banfield

Abstract

In the version of this Article originally published, in Fig. 1b the single-letter code for the amino acid polymorphism at position 46 in the schematic of the AVR-PikE variant was incorrectly given as 'H'. The correct amino acid is 'N'. This has now been amended in all versions of the Article.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,267,105
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#1,529
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,050
of 341,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#54
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.