↓ Skip to main content

Dietary advice in dental practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Dental Journal, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Dietary advice in dental practice
Published in
British Dental Journal, November 2002
DOI 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801628
Pubmed ID
Authors

P J Moynihan

Abstract

This paper aims to provide dental health professionals with practical advice to pass on to patients about diet and dental health. Sugars are the most important dietary factor contributing to dental caries. Different foods carry different dental health risks; those containing non-milk, extrinsic sugars are potentially the most damaging. In the UK, sugared soft drinks and confectionery contribute approximately 50% to total intake of non-milk extrinsic sugars. Patients should be encouraged to reduce the frequency of intake of sugary foods. Intake of acidic foods and drinks contributes to dental erosion and consumption of such foods should also be limited. Dietary advice to dental patients should be positive and personalized if possible and can be in line with dietary recommendations for general health. These are to increase the consumption of starchy staple foods (eg bread, potatoes and unsweetened cereals), vegetables and fruit and to reduce the consumption of sugary and fatty foods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 22%
Student > Bachelor 28 18%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 42 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#689,257
of 24,450,293 outputs
Outputs from British Dental Journal
#74
of 6,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#970
of 133,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Dental Journal
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,450,293 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.