"any proposed new technology risks fading away without patient optimization work and dedication" https://t.co/EkSfWAkm3X
@naturenano have a background check on labs before interviewing https://t.co/oEhKXPEwnx #academia #academics #phdchat
@NatureNano has a greater responsibility than relying on impact factors to interview lab heads. Do a background check of PIs: what is their modus operandi, how they treat ppl! Giving spotlight to PIs cos of IF is not good for science. More later! https://t
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
Interesting article on the (not direct) relationship between number of academic citations and patents. We always go back to the unsolved issue : how to measure impact of research?https://t.co/wK5ACx3aMi
Factors that make an #impact https://t.co/sSL5GNkcev
RT @nanowiki: Factors that make an impact. Measuring the influence of applied research papers #science #research https://t.co/oHvrzLrWCi
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @MannySchecter: Citations in #patents are also limited - patents often cite for reasons other than technical prowess/achievement... http…
RT @nanowiki: Factors that make an impact. Measuring the influence of applied research papers #science #research https://t.co/oHvrzLrWCi
Citations in #patents are also limited - patents often cite for reasons other than technical prowess/achievement... https://t.co/LH6cvBHP5m
Factors that make an impact. Measuring the influence of applied research papers #science #research https://t.co/oHvrzLrWCi
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @Enrique2604: El número de citas en los artículos académicos no siempre es una buena medida de su impacto, especialmente si el trabajo e…
RT @Enrique2604: El número de citas en los artículos académicos no siempre es una buena medida de su impacto, especialmente si el trabajo e…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @Enrique2604: El número de citas en los artículos académicos no siempre es una buena medida de su impacto, especialmente si el trabajo e…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
El número de citas en los artículos académicos no siempre es una buena medida de su impacto, especialmente si el trabajo está en las ciencias aplicadas. Es por eso que en su lugar miramos el número de citas en #patents https://t.co/H1pY0JfP5X
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
RT @raphavisses: If someone with an interest in responsible metrics, research culture, research evaluation, etc - wants to write a response…
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
If someone with an interest in responsible metrics, research culture, research evaluation, etc - wants to write a response to this piece, I would happily collaborate... https://t.co/YFl1XmEnwm
RT @NatureNano: Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sc…
Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for impact, especially if the work is in the applied sciences. That's why we looked at the number of citations in #patents instead. https://t.co/pexYl0JfDn https://t.co/t6x6BxEdTu
Number of citations in academic papers is not always a good measure for the influence of applied research papers ليس دائماً عدد الاقتباسات العلمية من المقالات العلمية يعكس تقدم البحوث العلمية التطبيقية بل هناك امر آخر ، تابع المقال https://t.co/9d5oz77zLU
A very good read 1👍 https://t.co/m9PmzyJbjU
Factors that make an impact https://t.co/gZuo5VsWea https://t.co/4d5WFCg9aK