↓ Skip to main content

Kinase-controlled phase transition of membraneless organelles in mitosis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
95 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
305 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
553 Mendeley
Title
Kinase-controlled phase transition of membraneless organelles in mitosis
Published in
Nature, July 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0279-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arpan Kumar Rai, Jia-Xuan Chen, Matthias Selbach, Lucas Pelkmans

Abstract

Liquid-liquid phase separation has been shown to underlie the formation and disassembly of membraneless organelles in cells, but the cellular mechanisms that control this phenomenon are poorly understood. A prominent example of regulated and reversible segregation of liquid phases may occur during mitosis, when membraneless organelles disappear upon nuclear-envelope breakdown and reappear as mitosis is completed. Here we show that the dual-specificity kinase DYRK3 acts as a central dissolvase of several types of membraneless organelle during mitosis. DYRK3 kinase activity is essential to prevent the unmixing of the mitotic cytoplasm into aberrant liquid-like hybrid organelles and the over-nucleation of spindle bodies. Our work supports a mechanism in which the dilution of phase-separating proteins during nuclear-envelope breakdown and the DYRK3-dependent degree of their solubility combine to allow cells to dissolve and condense several membraneless organelles during mitosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 553 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 553 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 120 22%
Researcher 100 18%
Student > Master 54 10%
Student > Bachelor 50 9%
Professor 29 5%
Other 90 16%
Unknown 110 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 232 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 17%
Chemistry 30 5%
Physics and Astronomy 13 2%
Neuroscience 13 2%
Other 54 10%
Unknown 116 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#372,822
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#18,923
of 97,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,141
of 342,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#398
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.