↓ Skip to main content

Pre-adsorption of antibodies enables targeting of nanocarriers despite a biomolecular corona

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Nanotechnology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
213 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Pre-adsorption of antibodies enables targeting of nanocarriers despite a biomolecular corona
Published in
Nature Nanotechnology, June 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41565-018-0171-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Tonigold, Johanna Simon, Diego Estupiñán, Maria Kokkinopoulou, Jonas Reinholz, Ulrike Kintzel, Anke Kaltbeitzel, Patricia Renz, Matthias P. Domogalla, Kerstin Steinbrink, Ingo Lieberwirth, Daniel Crespy, Katharina Landfester, Volker Mailänder

Abstract

To promote drug delivery to exact sites and cell types, the surface of nanocarriers is functionalized with targeting antibodies or ligands, typically coupled by covalent chemistry. Once the nanocarrier is exposed to biological fluid such as plasma, however, its surface is inevitably covered with various biomolecules forming the protein corona, which masks the targeting ability of the nanoparticle. Here, we show that we can use a pre-adsorption process to attach targeting antibodies to the surface of the nanocarrier. Pre-adsorbed antibodies remain functional and are not completely exchanged or covered by the biomolecular corona, whereas coupled antibodies are more affected by this shielding. We conclude that pre-adsorption is potentially a versatile, efficient and rapid method of attaching targeting moieties to the surface of nanocarriers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 283 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 25%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Master 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 69 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 45 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 7%
Materials Science 20 7%
Other 62 22%
Unknown 85 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#191,094
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Nature Nanotechnology
#116
of 3,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,558
of 329,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Nanotechnology
#2
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.