↓ Skip to main content

E-I balance emerges naturally from continuous Hebbian learning in autonomous neural networks

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
E-I balance emerges naturally from continuous Hebbian learning in autonomous neural networks
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-27099-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Trapp, Rodrigo Echeveste, Claudius Gros

Abstract

Spontaneous brain activity is characterized in part by a balanced asynchronous chaotic state. Cortical recordings show that excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) drivings in the E-I balanced state are substantially larger than the overall input. We show that such a state arises naturally in fully adapting networks which are deterministic, autonomously active and not subject to stochastic external or internal drivings. Temporary imbalances between excitatory and inhibitory inputs lead to large but short-lived activity bursts that stabilize irregular dynamics. We simulate autonomous networks of rate-encoding neurons for which all synaptic weights are plastic and subject to a Hebbian plasticity rule, the flux rule, that can be derived from the stationarity principle of statistical learning. Moreover, the average firing rate is regulated individually via a standard homeostatic adaption of the bias of each neuron's input-output non-linear function. Additionally, networks with and without short-term plasticity are considered. E-I balance may arise only when the mean excitatory and inhibitory weights are themselves balanced, modulo the overall activity level. We show that synaptic weight balance, which has been considered hitherto as given, naturally arises in autonomous neural networks when the here considered self-limiting Hebbian synaptic plasticity rule is continuously active.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 39%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 31%
Psychology 5 10%
Engineering 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,522,137
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#106,746
of 124,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,924
of 328,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,064
of 3,576 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,576 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.