↓ Skip to main content

Label Propagation Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions Based on Clinical Side Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Label Propagation Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions Based on Clinical Side Effects
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep12339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ping Zhang, Fei Wang, Jianying Hu, Robert Sorrentino

Abstract

Drug-drug interaction (DDI) is an important topic for public health, and thus attracts attention from both academia and industry. Here we hypothesize that clinical side effects (SEs) provide a human phenotypic profile and can be translated into the development of computational models for predicting adverse DDIs. We propose an integrative label propagation framework to predict DDIs by integrating SEs extracted from package inserts of prescription drugs, SEs extracted from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, and chemical structures from PubChem. Experimental results based on hold-out validation demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. In addition, the new algorithm also ranked drug information sources based on their contributions to the prediction, thus not only confirming that SEs are important features for DDI prediction but also paving the way for building more reliable DDI prediction models by prioritizing multiple data sources. By applying the proposed algorithm to 1,626 small-molecule drugs which have one or more SE profiles, we obtained 145,068 predicted DDIs. The predicted DDIs will help clinicians to avoid hazardous drug interactions in their prescriptions and will aid pharmaceutical companies to design large-scale clinical trial by assessing potentially hazardous drug combinations. All data sets and predicted DDIs are available at http://astro.temple.edu/~tua87106/ddi.html.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Master 23 17%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 40 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 41 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,533,886
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#22,417
of 142,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,162
of 276,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#316
of 1,970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.