↓ Skip to main content

Molecular recognition of wood polyphenols by phase II detoxification enzymes of the white rot Trametes versicolor

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Molecular recognition of wood polyphenols by phase II detoxification enzymes of the white rot Trametes versicolor
Published in
Scientific Reports, May 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-26601-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathieu Schwartz, Thomas Perrot, Emmanuel Aubert, Stéphane Dumarçay, Frédérique Favier, Philippe Gérardin, Mélanie Morel-Rouhier, Guillermo Mulliert, Fanny Saiag, Claude Didierjean, Eric Gelhaye

Abstract

Wood decay fungi have complex detoxification systems that enable them to cope with secondary metabolites produced by plants. Although the number of genes encoding for glutathione transferases is especially expanded in lignolytic fungi, little is known about their target molecules. In this study, by combining biochemical, enzymatic and structural approaches, interactions between polyphenols and six glutathione transferases from the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor have been demonstrated. Two isoforms, named TvGSTO3S and TvGSTO6S have been deeply studied at the structural level. Each isoform shows two distinct ligand-binding sites, a narrow L-site at the dimer interface and a peculiar deep hydrophobic H-site. In TvGSTO3S, the latter appears optimized for aromatic ligand binding such as hydroxybenzophenones. Affinity crystallography revealed that this H-site retains the flavonoid dihydrowogonin from a partially purified wild-cherry extract. Besides, TvGSTO6S binds two molecules of the flavonoid naringenin in the L-site. These data suggest that TvGSTO isoforms could interact with plant polyphenols released during wood degradation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Unspecified 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,005,966
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#73,270
of 124,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,513
of 331,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,100
of 3,510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.