| Title |
Interdisciplinary collaboration in action: tracking the signal, tracing the noise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1057/palcomms.2015.19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felicity Callard, Des Fitzgerald, Angela Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 32% |
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 72% |
| Scientists | 9 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 24 | 29% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,046,570
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#293
of 2,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,530
of 276,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.