| Title |
Updated, augmented vaccines compete with original antigenic sin
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature Medicine, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nm0615-540 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shraddha Chakradhar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| Japan | 4 | 9% |
| Canada | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 68% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,001,963
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#2,447
of 9,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,051
of 272,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#32
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 104.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.