↓ Skip to main content

Membrane depolarization and aberrant lipid distributions in the neonatal rat brain following hypoxic-ischaemic insult

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Membrane depolarization and aberrant lipid distributions in the neonatal rat brain following hypoxic-ischaemic insult
Published in
Scientific Reports, May 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-25088-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominika Luptakova, Ladislav Baciak, Tomas Pluhacek, Anton Skriba, Blanka Sediva, Vladimir Havlicek, Ivo Juranek

Abstract

Neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic (HI) encephalopathy is among the most serious complications in neonatology. In the present study, we studied the immediate (0 hour), subacute (36 hours) and late (144 hours) responses of the neonatal brain to experimental HI insult in laboratory rats. At the striatal level, the mass spectrometry imaging revealed an aberrant plasma membrane distribution of Na+/K+ ions in the oedema-affected areas. The failure of the Na+/K+ gradients was also apparent in the magnetic resonance imaging measurements, demonstrating intracellular water accumulation during the acute phase of the HI insult. During the subacute phase, compared with the control brains, an incipient accumulation of an array of N-acylphosphatidylethanolamine (NAPE) molecules was detected in the HI-affected brains, and both the cytotoxic and vasogenic types of oedema were detected. In the severely affected brain areas, abnormal distributions of the monosialogangliosides GM2 and GM3 were observed in two-thirds of the animals exposed to the insult. During the late stage, a partial restoration of the brain tissue was observed in most rats in both the in vivo and ex vivo studies. These specific molecular changes may be further utilized in neonatology practice in proposing and testing novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of neonatal HI encephalopathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 17%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Chemistry 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#13,518,432
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#60,990
of 124,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,504
of 326,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,687
of 3,351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.