↓ Skip to main content

Large Seebeck effect by charge-mobility engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Large Seebeck effect by charge-mobility engineering
Published in
Nature Communications, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms8475
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peijie Sun, Beipei Wei, Jiahao Zhang, Jan M. Tomczak, A.M. Strydom, M. Søndergaard, Bo B. Iversen, Frank Steglich

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 136 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 28%
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 50 35%
Physics and Astronomy 36 25%
Chemistry 12 8%
Engineering 12 8%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 28 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,120,372
of 17,687,978 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#32,132
of 34,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,559
of 233,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#594
of 658 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,687,978 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 658 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.