| Title |
Endogenous Arabidopsis messenger RNAs transported to distant tissues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Plants, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nplants.2015.25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christoph J. Thieme, Monica Rojas-Triana, Ewelina Stecyk, Christian Schudoma, Wenna Zhang, Lei Yang, Miguel Miñambres, Dirk Walther, Waltraud X. Schulze, Javier Paz-Ares, Wolf-Rüdiger Scheible, Friedrich Kragler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Germany | 2 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 577 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 561 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 122 | 21% |
| Researcher | 102 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 72 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 7% |
| Other | 73 | 13% |
| Unknown | 110 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 294 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 130 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 4 | <1% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | <1% |
| Engineering | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 3% |
| Unknown | 128 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#982,664
of 25,397,764 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#571
of 2,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,305
of 278,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#10
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,397,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.