↓ Skip to main content

Oscillation of the velvet worm slime jet by passive hydrodynamic instability

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
3 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Oscillation of the velvet worm slime jet by passive hydrodynamic instability
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7292
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrés Concha, Paula Mellado, Bernal Morera-Brenes, Cristiano Sampaio Costa, L Mahadevan, Julián Monge-Nájera

Abstract

The rapid squirt of a proteinaceous slime jet endows velvet worms (Onychophora) with a unique mechanism for defence from predators and for capturing prey by entangling them in a disordered web that immobilizes their target. However, to date, neither qualitative nor quantitative descriptions have been provided for this unique adaptation. Here we investigate the fast oscillatory motion of the oral papillae and the exiting liquid jet that oscillates with frequencies f~30-60 Hz. Using anatomical images, high-speed videography, theoretical analysis and a physical simulacrum, we show that this fast oscillatory motion is the result of an elastohydrodynamic instability driven by the interplay between the elasticity of oral papillae and the fast unsteady flow during squirting. Our results demonstrate how passive strategies can be cleverly harnessed by organisms, while suggesting future oscillating microfluidic devices, as well as novel ways for micro and nanofibre production using bioinspired strategies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Taiwan 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 68 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Professor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 22%
Engineering 10 14%
Physics and Astronomy 7 10%
Materials Science 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 19 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#149,476
of 23,468,283 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#2,107
of 48,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,854
of 288,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#21
of 762 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,468,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 762 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.