↓ Skip to main content

Mutations in the gene encoding pejvakin, a newly identified protein of the afferent auditory pathway, cause DFNB59 auditory neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Mutations in the gene encoding pejvakin, a newly identified protein of the afferent auditory pathway, cause DFNB59 auditory neuropathy
Published in
Nature Genetics, June 2006
DOI 10.1038/ng1829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sedigheh Delmaghani, Francisco J del Castillo, Vincent Michel, Michel Leibovici, Asadollah Aghaie, Uri Ron, Lut Van Laer, Nir Ben-Tal, Guy Van Camp, Dominique Weil, Francina Langa, Mark Lathrop, Paul Avan, Christine Petit

Abstract

Auditory neuropathy is a particular type of hearing impairment in which neural transmission of the auditory signal is impaired, while cochlear outer hair cells remain functional. Here we report on DFNB59, a newly identified gene on chromosome 2q31.1-q31.3 mutated in four families segregating autosomal recessive auditory neuropathy. DFNB59 encodes pejvakin, a 352-residue protein. Pejvakin is a paralog of DFNA5, a protein of unknown function also involved in deafness. By immunohistofluorescence, pejvakin is detected in the cell bodies of neurons of the afferent auditory pathway. Furthermore, Dfnb59 knock-in mice, homozygous for the R183W variant identified in one DFNB59 family, show abnormal auditory brainstem responses indicative of neuronal dysfunction along the auditory pathway. Unlike previously described sensorineural deafness genes, all of which underlie cochlear cell pathologies, DFNB59 is the first human gene implicated in nonsyndromic deafness due to a neuronal defect.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Unknown 158 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 26%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Master 21 13%
Professor 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 15%
Neuroscience 15 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 37 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,460,152
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,933
of 7,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,796
of 64,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#13
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.