| Title |
Identification of homozygous deletions of tumor suppressor gene FAT in oral cancer using CGH-array
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oncogene, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1038/sj.onc.1210330 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K Nakaya, H D Yamagata, N Arita, K-i Nakashiro, M Nose, T Miki, H Hamakawa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,272,356
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Oncogene
#1,336
of 10,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,584
of 76,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncogene
#11
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.