↓ Skip to main content

The role of T cell interleukin-17 in conducting destructive arthritis: lessons from animal models

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
334 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
The role of T cell interleukin-17 in conducting destructive arthritis: lessons from animal models
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, November 2004
DOI 10.1186/ar1478
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Lubberts, Marije I Koenders, Wim B van den Berg

Abstract

Interleukin-17 (IL-17) is a T cell cytokine spontaneously produced by cultures of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovial membranes. High levels have been detected in the synovial fluid of patients with RA. The trigger for IL-17 is not fully identified; however, IL-23 promotes the production of IL-17 and a strong correlation between IL-15 and IL-17 levels in synovial fluid has been observed. IL-17 is a potent inducer of various cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, IL-1, and receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL). Additive or even synergistic effects with IL-1 and TNF-alpha in inducing cytokine expression and joint damage have been shown in vitro and in vivo. This review describes the role of IL-17 in the pathogenesis of destructive arthritis with a major focus on studies in vivo in arthritis models. From these studies in vivo it can be concluded that IL-17 becomes significant when T cells are a major element of the arthritis process. Moreover, IL-17 has the capacity to induce joint destruction in an IL-1-independent manner and can bypass TNF-dependent arthritis. Anti-IL-17 cytokine therapy is of interest as an additional new anti-rheumatic strategy for RA, in particular in situations in which elevated IL-17 might attenuate the response to anti-TNF/anti-IL-1 therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 166 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Professor 7 4%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2010.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,756
of 3,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,084
of 154,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.