Response to "Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo". https://t.co/oQr8EYfcAf
RT @PlantEvolution: Former WeigelWorld postdoc Sang-tae Kim first author on one of the papers debunking claim of rampant off-target mutatio…
RT @PlantEvolution: Former WeigelWorld postdoc Sang-tae Kim first author on one of the papers debunking claim of rampant off-target mutatio…
Former WeigelWorld postdoc Sang-tae Kim first author on one of the papers debunking claim of rampant off-target mutations in #CRISPR #GenomeEditing mice https://t.co/a9fIX7uAiO
RT @CRISPR_papers: Response to "Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo". https://t.co/PQ2s4jQkyG
Response to "Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo". https://t.co/PQ2s4jQkyG
Together with the Editorial Retraction Note the journal @naturemethods also released today three critical responses from three different labs confronting the controversial results presented in 2017: https://t.co/Ab6wsw1om5 https://t.co/H0DA5HynxQ https://
Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo by Jin-soo Kim https://t.co/6vaPZxkkke
Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo” https://t.co/c9fWGNUujF