@Ozan__Caglayan This is the single worst idea I have ever heard with respect to peer review: https://t.co/sXaqOCUvRa
Just the Facts https://t.co/ZEEO0owwiu
Amazing how useful The Golden Rule is when it comes to peer review!
"Peer review is most effective when it is focused on the facts" An excellent editorial @CommsBio @Brooke_LaFlamme https://t.co/t3ahENOjoO
Great editorial about rules of conduct when reviewing and being reviewed. Just sent it to my branch as a good reminder to all.
RT @Brooke_LaFlamme: YES. “Don’t be a dick” was the working title for this editorial https://t.co/tgp1rhbXh7 https://t.co/GjUa9HaooS
RT @Brooke_LaFlamme: YES. “Don’t be a dick” was the working title for this editorial https://t.co/tgp1rhbXh7 https://t.co/GjUa9HaooS
YES. “Don’t be a dick” was the working title for this editorial https://t.co/tgp1rhbXh7
Scientific investigation is grounded in the objective pursuit of facts as guided by the scientific method. The process by which new results are vetted and communicated publicly—peer review—should be guided by similar principles. https://t.co/jRtVNHahJ
RT @CommsBio: "Whether in a review, rebuttal or public discussion of another scientist’s work, a guiding principle is the Golden Rule: do u…
RT @CommsBio: "Whether in a review, rebuttal or public discussion of another scientist’s work, a guiding principle is the Golden Rule: do u…
"Whether in a review, rebuttal or public discussion of another scientist’s work, a guiding principle is the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Read our latest editorial: https://t.co/6xfQAO7NsW #peerreview https://t.co/BjX4UsR
RT @CommsBio: Our new editorial discusses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/k1j1rlzGVg
RT @CommsBio: Our new editorial discusses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/k1j1rlzGVg
RT @CommsBio: Our new editorial discusses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/k1j1rlzGVg
Our new editorial discusses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/k1j1rlzGVg
RT @Brooke_LaFlamme: Editorial published today in @CommsBio addresses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/tgp…
RT @Brooke_LaFlamme: Editorial published today in @CommsBio addresses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/tgp…
RT @Brooke_LaFlamme: Editorial published today in @CommsBio addresses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/tgp…
RT @Brooke_LaFlamme: Editorial published today in @CommsBio addresses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/tgp…
RT @mnitabach: This is nice, but only the most ham-handed buffoons can't easily destroy papers while remaining "fair" & "civil". https://t…
This is nice, but only the most ham-handed buffoons can't easily destroy papers while remaining "fair" & "civil". https://t.co/KsNpxpSfXG
RT @Brooke_LaFlamme: Editorial published today in @CommsBio addresses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/tgp…
RT @Brooke_LaFlamme: Editorial published today in @CommsBio addresses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/tgp…
RT @Brooke_LaFlamme: Editorial published today in @CommsBio addresses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/tgp…
RT @Brooke_LaFlamme: Editorial published today in @CommsBio addresses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/tgp…
Editorial published today in @CommsBio addresses the need for civility and objectivity in peer review https://t.co/tgp1rhbXh7