↓ Skip to main content

Early geochemical environment of Mars as determined from thermodynamics of phyllosilicates

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Early geochemical environment of Mars as determined from thermodynamics of phyllosilicates
Published in
Nature, July 2007
DOI 10.1038/nature05961
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent Chevrier, Francois Poulet, Jean-Pierre Bibring

Abstract

Images of geomorphological features that seem to have been produced by the action of liquid water have been considered evidence for wet surface conditions on early Mars. Moreover, the recent identification of large deposits of phyllosilicates, associated with the ancient Noachian terrains suggests long-timescale weathering of the primary basaltic crust by liquid water. It has been proposed that a greenhouse effect resulting from a carbon-dioxide-rich atmosphere sustained the temperate climate required to maintain liquid water on the martian surface during the Noachian. The apparent absence of carbonates and the low escape rates of carbon dioxide, however, are indicative of an early martian atmosphere with low levels of carbon dioxide. Here we investigate the geochemical conditions prevailing on the surface of Mars during the Noachian period using calculations of the aqueous equilibria of phyllosilicates. Our results show that Fe3+-rich phyllosilicates probably precipitated under weakly acidic to alkaline pH, an environment different from that of the following period, which was dominated by strongly acid weathering that led to the sulphate deposits identified on Mars. Thermodynamic calculations demonstrate that the oxidation state of the martian surface was already high, supporting early escape of hydrogen. Finally, equilibrium with carbonates implies that phyllosilicate precipitation occurs preferentially at a very low partial pressure of carbon dioxide. We suggest that the possible absence of Noachian carbonates more probably resulted from low levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, rather than primary acidic conditions. Other greenhouse gases may therefore have played a part in sustaining a warm and wet climate on the early Mars.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Italy 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 123 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 25%
Student > Master 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 9%
Professor 10 7%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 83 61%
Physics and Astronomy 17 13%
Chemistry 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 18 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,684,170
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#66,317
of 92,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,964
of 69,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#402
of 504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.