| Title |
Impact of Drinking Water Fluoride on Human Thyroid Hormones: A Case- Control Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-20696-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zohreh Kheradpisheh, Masoud Mirzaei, Amir Hossein Mahvi, Mehdi Mokhtari, Reyhane Azizi, Hossein Fallahzadeh, Mohammad Hassan Ehrampoush |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 181 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 14% |
| Canada | 12 | 7% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 91 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 155 | 86% |
| Scientists | 12 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 52 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#193,824
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,345
of 143,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,487
of 450,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#70
of 3,860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.