↓ Skip to main content

Rapid growth at deep-sea vents

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Rapid growth at deep-sea vents
Published in
Nature, October 1994
DOI 10.1038/371663a0
Authors

Richard A. Lutz, Timothy M. Shank, Daniel J. Fornari, Rachel M. Haymon, Marvin D. Lilley, Karen L. Von Damm, Daniel Desbruyeres

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Spain 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 87 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Professor 9 9%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 20%
Environmental Science 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,325
of 90,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,459
of 22,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#111
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.