↓ Skip to main content

Rapid growth at deep-sea vents

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Rapid growth at deep-sea vents
Published in
Nature, October 1994
DOI 10.1038/371663a0
Authors

Richard A. Lutz, Timothy M. Shank, Daniel J. Fornari, Rachel M. Haymon, Marvin D. Lilley, Karen L. Von Damm, Daniel Desbruyeres

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
Spain 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 76 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Professor 9 10%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 20%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 14 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,255,402
of 16,479,843 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#55,218
of 77,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,217
of 292,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#862
of 910 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,479,843 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 88.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 910 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.