| Title |
Fossil evidence of water lilies (Nymphaeales) in the Early Cretaceous
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1038/35066557 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Else Marie Friis, Kaj Raunsgaard Pedersen, Peter R. Crane |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 4 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 23% |
| Professor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 54% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,325
of 90,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,128
of 40,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#215
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.