Title |
Full-Sun observations for identifying the source of the slow solar wind
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1038/ncomms6947 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David H. Brooks, Ignacio Ugarte-Urra, Harry P. Warren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 24% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Finland | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
Scientists | 8 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
China | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 35% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 34 | 69% |
Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2017.
All research outputs
#493,125
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#8,513
of 49,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,415
of 356,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#80
of 687 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 687 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.