↓ Skip to main content

Full-Sun observations for identifying the source of the slow solar wind

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Full-Sun observations for identifying the source of the slow solar wind
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms6947
Pubmed ID
Authors

David H. Brooks, Ignacio Ugarte-Urra, Harry P. Warren

Abstract

Fast (>700 km s(-1)) and slow (~400 km s(-1)) winds stream from the Sun, permeate the heliosphere and influence the near-Earth environment. While the fast wind is known to emanate primarily from polar coronal holes, the source of the slow wind remains unknown. Here we identify possible sites of origin using a slow solar wind source map of the entire Sun, which we construct from specially designed, full-disk observations from the Hinode satellite, and a magnetic field model. Our map provides a full-Sun observation that combines three key ingredients for identifying the sources: velocity, plasma composition and magnetic topology and shows them as solar wind composition plasma outflowing on open magnetic field lines. The area coverage of the identified sources is large enough that the sum of their mass contributions can explain a significant fraction of the mass loss rate of the solar wind.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Finland 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 29 73%
Chemistry 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2017.
All research outputs
#347,354
of 18,925,350 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6,289
of 37,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,730
of 325,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#181
of 1,507 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,925,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,507 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.