| Title |
Precision measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant using cold atoms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature13433 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. Rosi, F. Sorrentino, L. Cacciapuoti, M. Prevedelli, G. M. Tino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 8% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Thailand | 2 | 4% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 71% |
| Scientists | 10 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 29% |
| Researcher | 61 | 23% |
| Professor | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 198 | 74% |
| Engineering | 11 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#208,175
of 25,846,867 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#12,289
of 98,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,585
of 244,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#138
of 1,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,846,867 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.