↓ Skip to main content

How poverty affects diet to shape the microbiota and chronic disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Immunology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
155 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
How poverty affects diet to shape the microbiota and chronic disease
Published in
Nature Reviews Immunology, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/nri.2017.121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christy A. Harrison, Douglas Taren

Abstract

Here, we discuss the link between nutrition, non-communicable chronic diseases and socio-economic standing, with a special focus on the microbiota. We provide a theoretical framework and several lines of evidence from both animal and human studies that support the idea that income inequality is an underlying factor for the maladaptive changes seen in the microbiota in certain populations. We propose that this contributes to the health disparities that are seen between lower-income and higher-income populations in high-income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 155 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 19%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 46 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 57 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#396,134
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Immunology
#191
of 2,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,286
of 344,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Immunology
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.