↓ Skip to main content

Sustaining dry surfaces under water

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Sustaining dry surfaces under water
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep12311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul R. Jones, Xiuqing Hao, Eduardo R. Cruz-Chu, Konrad Rykaczewski, Krishanu Nandy, Thomas M. Schutzius, Kripa K. Varanasi, Constantine M. Megaridis, Jens H. Walther, Petros Koumoutsakos, Horacio D. Espinosa, Neelesh A. Patankar

Abstract

Rough surfaces immersed under water remain practically dry if the liquid-solid contact is on roughness peaks, while the roughness valleys are filled with gas. Mechanisms that prevent water from invading the valleys are well studied. However, to remain practically dry under water, additional mechanisms need consideration. This is because trapped gas (e.g. air) in the roughness valleys can dissolve into the water pool, leading to invasion. Additionally, water vapor can also occupy the roughness valleys of immersed surfaces. If water vapor condenses, that too leads to invasion. These effects have not been investigated, and are critically important to maintain surfaces dry under water. In this work, we identify the critical roughness scale, below which it is possible to sustain the vapor phase of water and/or trapped gases in roughness valleys - thus keeping the immersed surface dry. Theoretical predictions are consistent with molecular dynamics simulations and experiments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 148 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 31%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 56 35%
Materials Science 32 20%
Physics and Astronomy 12 8%
Chemistry 10 6%
Chemical Engineering 8 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2015.
All research outputs
#709,528
of 24,368,983 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,713
of 132,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,353
of 270,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#138
of 1,978 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,368,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,978 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.