| Title |
A critique of methods for temperature imaging in single cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3073 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Baffou, Hervé Rigneault, Didier Marguet, Ludovic Jullien |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Vanuatu | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 256 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 71 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 42 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 78 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 11% |
| Engineering | 30 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 55 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,243,576
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,580
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,343
of 251,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#26
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.