| Title |
Building a better mouse test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.1698 |
| Pubmed ID |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 41% |
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2012.
All research outputs
#2,853,082
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,513
of 4,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,900
of 124,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#32
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.