| Title |
Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-09084-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julien Troudet, Philippe Grandcolas, Amandine Blin, Régine Vignes-Lebbe, Frédéric Legendre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 549 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 80 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 67 | 12% |
| Spain | 36 | 7% |
| Canada | 33 | 6% |
| France | 30 | 5% |
| Australia | 10 | 2% |
| Brazil | 9 | 2% |
| South Africa | 6 | 1% |
| Colombia | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 90 | 16% |
| Unknown | 182 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 352 | 64% |
| Scientists | 179 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 818 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 818 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 145 | 18% |
| Researcher | 127 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 114 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 108 | 13% |
| Other | 41 | 5% |
| Other | 116 | 14% |
| Unknown | 167 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 322 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 188 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 52 | 6% |
| Unknown | 204 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 451. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#62,635
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#881
of 142,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,324
of 326,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#29
of 5,893 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,893 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.