↓ Skip to main content

KinomeXplorer: an integrated platform for kinome biology studies

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
KinomeXplorer: an integrated platform for kinome biology studies
Published in
Nature Methods, May 2014
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.2968
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heiko Horn, Erwin M Schoof, Jinho Kim, Xavier Robin, Martin L Miller, Francesca Diella, Anita Palma, Gianni Cesareni, Lars Juhl Jensen, Rune Linding

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Netherlands 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Unknown 238 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 29%
Researcher 63 25%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Professor 15 6%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 16 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 85 33%
Chemistry 10 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Computer Science 9 4%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 23 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,488,854
of 18,017,546 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,781
of 4,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,922
of 198,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#55
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,017,546 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.