| Title |
KinomeXplorer: an integrated platform for kinome biology studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.2968 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heiko Horn, Erwin M Schoof, Jinho Kim, Xavier Robin, Martin L Miller, Francesca Diella, Anita Palma, Gianni Cesareni, Lars Juhl Jensen, Rune Linding |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 265 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 29% |
| Researcher | 66 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Professor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 94 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 31% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,574,148
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#3,196
of 5,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,880
of 240,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#50
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.