↓ Skip to main content

Strong, tough and stiff bioinspired ceramics from brittle constituents

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
12 X users
patent
10 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
712 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
661 Mendeley
Title
Strong, tough and stiff bioinspired ceramics from brittle constituents
Published in
Nature Materials, March 2014
DOI 10.1038/nmat3915
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Bouville, Eric Maire, Sylvain Meille, Bertrand Van de Moortèle, Adam J. Stevenson, Sylvain Deville

Abstract

High strength and high toughness are usually mutually exclusive in engineering materials. In ceramics, improving toughness usually relies on the introduction of a metallic or polymeric ductile phase, but this decreases the material's strength and stiffness as well as its high-temperature stability. Although natural materials that are both strong and tough rely on a combination of mechanisms operating at different length scales, the relevant structures have been extremely difficult to replicate. Here, we report a bioinspired approach based on widespread ceramic processing techniques for the fabrication of bulk ceramics without a ductile phase and with a unique combination of high strength (470 MPa), high toughness (22 MPa m(1/2)), and high stiffness (290 GPa). Because only mineral constituents are needed, these ceramics retain their mechanical properties at high temperatures (600 °C). Our bioinspired, material-independent approach should find uses in the design and processing of materials for structural, transportation and energy-related applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 661 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 638 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 184 28%
Researcher 94 14%
Student > Master 67 10%
Student > Bachelor 42 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 36 5%
Other 111 17%
Unknown 127 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 211 32%
Engineering 139 21%
Chemistry 65 10%
Physics and Astronomy 20 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 1%
Other 39 6%
Unknown 179 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#370,518
of 24,715,720 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#321
of 4,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,135
of 228,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#11
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,715,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.