| Title |
Deeply divergent archaic mitochondrial genome provides lower time boundary for African gene flow into Neanderthals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms16046 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cosimo Posth, Christoph Wißing, Keiko Kitagawa, Luca Pagani, Laura van Holstein, Fernando Racimo, Kurt Wehrberger, Nicholas J. Conard, Claus Joachim Kind, Hervé Bocherens, Johannes Krause |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 321 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 62 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 9% |
| Spain | 11 | 3% |
| France | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Italy | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Sweden | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 58 | 18% |
| Unknown | 122 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 211 | 66% |
| Scientists | 93 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 375 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 16% |
| Researcher | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 7% |
| Professor | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 16% |
| Unknown | 70 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 68 | 18% |
| Arts and Humanities | 44 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 49 | 13% |
| Unknown | 82 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#13,424
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#262
of 58,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212
of 330,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#6
of 982 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 982 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.