↓ Skip to main content

Exsolution trends and co-segregation aspects of self-grown catalyst nanoparticles in perovskites

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
313 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
Title
Exsolution trends and co-segregation aspects of self-grown catalyst nanoparticles in perovskites
Published in
Nature Communications, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms15967
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ohhun Kwon, Sivaprakash Sengodan, Kyeounghak Kim, Gihyeon Kim, Hu Young Jeong, Jeeyoung Shin, Young-Wan Ju, Jeong Woo Han, Guntae Kim

Abstract

In perovskites, exsolution of transition metals has been proposed as a smart catalyst design for energy applications. Although there exist transition metals with superior catalytic activity, they are limited by their ability to exsolve under a reducing environment. When a doping element is present in the perovskite, it is often observed that the surface segregation of the doping element is changed by oxygen vacancies. However, the mechanism of co-segregation of doping element with oxygen vacancies is still an open question. Here we report trends in the exsolution of transition metal (Mn, Co, Ni and Fe) on the PrBaMn2O5+δ layered perovskite oxide related to the co-segregation energy. Transmission electron microscopic observations show that easily reducible cations (Mn, Co and Ni) are exsolved from the perovskite depending on the transition metal-perovskite reducibility. In addition, using density functional calculations we reveal that co-segregation of B-site dopant and oxygen vacancies plays a central role in the exsolution.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 300 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 19%
Researcher 48 16%
Student > Master 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 65 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 70 23%
Chemistry 44 15%
Chemical Engineering 37 12%
Engineering 24 8%
Energy 15 5%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 94 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,141,121
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#17,259
of 47,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,080
of 315,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#437
of 1,041 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,041 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.