| Title |
Erratum: Corrigendum: A viral strategy for targeting and manipulating interneurons across vertebrate species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nn0717-1033c |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordane Dimidschstein, Qian Chen, Robin Tremblay, Stephanie L Rogers, Giuseppe-Antonio Saldi, Lihua Guo, Qing Xu, Runpeng Liu, Congyi Lu, Jianhua Chu, Michael C Avery, Mohammad S Rashid, Myungin Baek, Amanda L Jacob, Gordon B Smith, Daniel E Wilson, Georg Kosche, Illya Kruglikov, Tomasz Rusielewicz, Vibhakar C Kotak, Todd M Mowery, Stewart A Anderson, Edward M Callaway, Jeremy S Dasen, David Fitzpatrick, Valentina Fossati, Michael A Long, Scott Noggle, John H Reynolds, Dan H Sanes, Bernardo Rudy, Guoping Feng, Gord Fishell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Egypt | 1 | 20% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,173,117
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#4,733
of 5,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,950
of 328,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#57
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.