| Title |
Don’t let Europe’s open-science dream drift
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/546451a |
| Pubmed ID |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 298 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 33 | 11% |
| United States | 30 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 18 | 6% |
| Germany | 11 | 4% |
| France | 11 | 4% |
| Spain | 11 | 4% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 8 | 3% |
| Belgium | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 54 | 18% |
| Unknown | 107 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 188 | 63% |
| Scientists | 86 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 31% |
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#206,216
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#12,233
of 98,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,371
of 331,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#248
of 807 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 807 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.