↓ Skip to main content

When coloured sounds taste sweet

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
When coloured sounds taste sweet
Published in
Nature, March 2005
DOI 10.1038/434038a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gian Beeli, Michaela Esslen, Lutz Jäncke

Abstract

Synaesthesia is the involuntary physical experience of a cross-modal linkage--for example, hearing a tone (the inducing stimulus) evokes an additional sensation of seeing a colour (concurrent perception). Of the different types of synaesthesia, most have colour as the concurrent perception, with concurrent perceptions of smell or taste being rare. Here we describe the case of a musician who experiences different tastes in response to hearing different musical tone intervals, and who makes use of her synaesthetic sensations in the complex task of tone-interval identification. To our knowledge, this combination of inducing stimulus and concurrent perception has not been described before.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 3%
Italy 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 129 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 19%
Researcher 27 19%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Professor 12 8%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 27%
Neuroscience 16 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,525,197
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#59,496
of 90,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,960
of 59,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#230
of 415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.