↓ Skip to main content

Conserved linear dynamics of single-molecule Brownian motion

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Conserved linear dynamics of single-molecule Brownian motion
Published in
Nature Communications, June 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms15675
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maged F. Serag, Satoshi Habuchi

Abstract

Macromolecular diffusion in homogeneous fluid at length scales greater than the size of the molecule is regarded as a random process. The mean-squared displacement (MSD) of molecules in this regime increases linearly with time. Here we show that non-random motion of DNA molecules in this regime that is undetectable by the MSD analysis can be quantified by characterizing the molecular motion relative to a latticed frame of reference. Our lattice occupancy analysis reveals unexpected sub-modes of motion of DNA that deviate from expected random motion in the linear, diffusive regime. We demonstrate that a subtle interplay between these sub-modes causes the overall diffusive motion of DNA to appear to conform to the linear regime. Our results show that apparently random motion of macromolecules could be governed by non-random dynamics that are detectable only by their relative motion. Our analytical approach should advance broad understanding of diffusion processes of fundamental relevance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 32%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Physics and Astronomy 4 12%
Engineering 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2017.
All research outputs
#979,289
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#15,476
of 47,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,927
of 317,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#434
of 1,094 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,094 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.