| Title |
Local metabolites linked to memory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature22498 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Ashley Watson, Li-Huei Tsai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 62% |
| Scientists | 16 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Professor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,124,047
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#33,703
of 98,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,163
of 331,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#563
of 817 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 817 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.