| Title |
Brotherly love benefits females
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature12853 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott Pitnick, David W. Pfennig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 38 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,348,454
of 25,059,640 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#51,297
of 96,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,595
of 318,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#643
of 900 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,059,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 900 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.